Legislature(2021 - 2022)BUTROVICH 205
03/31/2022 01:30 PM Senate HEALTH & SOCIAL SERVICES
Note: the audio ![]()
and video ![]()
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| SB175 | |
| HB184 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| += | SB 175 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | HB 184 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
HB 184-REQUIRE TRIBAL CHILD WELFARE COMPACT
2:12:07 PM
CHAIR WILSON reconvened the meeting and announced the
consideration of HOUSE BILL NO. 184 "An Act requiring state
participation in a tribal child welfare compact."
2:12:41 PM
REPRESENTATIVE TIFFANY ZULKOSKY, Alaska State Legislature,
Juneau, Alaska, sponsor of HB 184 stated that this legislation
seeks to protect the implementation of the Alaska Tribal Child
Welfare Compact by codifying it in Alaska statute.
REPRESENTATIVE ZULKOSKY explained that the State of Alaska
entered the landmark Tribal Child Welfare Compact (Compact) with
18 Tribal cosigners, representing 161 federally-recognized
Alaska Native Tribes. The Alaska Tribal Child Welfare Compact
would offer the state systemic innovation to provide services
and care that every child deserves. She offered her view that
there were elements in this policy that all legislators could
embrace. If fully implemented, it could save the state millions
of dollars over time and transform a struggling child welfare
system with its policies.
REPRESENTATIVE ZULKOSKY turned to slide 2, Why the Work Began.
REPRESENTATIVE ZULKOSKY highlighted that the Office of
Children's Services (OCS) has high staff turnover rates and
frontline workers carry caseloads more than three times the
national average despite the legislature's efforts to address
the issue.
REPRESENTATIVE ZULKOSKY stated that Alaska Native children make
up 15 percent of Alaska's children but roughly 60 percent of the
children in state custody. She said disparities of this nature
generally indicate a failure in the child welfare system.
2:14:20 PM
REPRESENTATIVE ZULKOSKY turned to slide 3, How the Work Began.
She stated that tribes, the state, and invited stakeholders had
worked collaboratively on child welfare issues for over 25 years
through tribal and state efforts. The goals are to strengthen
Alaska's compliance with the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA) of
1978, reduce the disproportionality of Alaska Native children in
state custody, and build and strengthen the relationships
between stakeholder groups.
REPRESENTATIVE ZULKOSKY stated that Tribal Title IV-E agreements
provide tribes with a higher federal reimbursement rate than
states for services including foster care, guardianship, and
adoption assistance. This means that tribal and state
partnerships can leverage increased federal funding and save
state dollars.
2:15:08 PM
REPRESENTATIVE ZULKOSKY reviewed slide 4, What is Alaska's
Tribal Child Welfare Compact, which read:
[Original punctuation provided.]
The Alaska Tribal Welfare Compact (Compact) is a
government-to-government agreement to improve the life
outcomes for Alaska's children and families by
transferring specific, negotiated child welfare
services and supports (including revenue streams) from
the Office of Children's Services (OCS) to the Tribal
CoSigners
The Compact was signed in 2017 by Governor Walker and
18 Tribal Co-Signers; representing 161 Federally-
recognized Tribes and Tribal Organizations and
continued under Governor Dunleavy in 2019
REPRESENTATIVE ZULKOSKY asked members to keep in mind that the
Alaska Tribal Child Welfare Compact does not transfer the
jurisdiction of the child to the tribe. It remains solely with
the state. She said that tribes are better positioned than OCS
to focus on prevention and early intervention strategies for
vulnerable families using the compact.
2:15:46 PM
REPRESENTATIVE ZULKOSKY reviewed slide 5, Implementation
Timeline.
[Original punctuation provided.]
2018
square4 Tribal Co-Signers developed their programs, built
capacity and infrastructure
square4 OCS began sharing Protective Services Reports
(PSRs or 'screen ins' or 'screen outs'), and provided
training and technical support
2019
square4 Tribal Co-Signers began performing Initial Diligent
Relative Searches
square4 The Parties negotiated four new Scopes of Work for
Ongoing Relatives Searches, Family Contact,
Licensing Assists, and Safety Evaluations
square4 State-Tribal partnership was stalled due to a change
in Administration
REPRESENTATIVE ZULKOSKY noted that the tribes and OCS were
grateful for the support of Governors Walker and Dunleavy.
Still, because it is not in statute but is an executive
initiative, this adds significant ambiguity to the vital work
done under the Compact.
2:16:19 PM
REPRESENTATIVE ZULKOSKY reviewed slide 6, Implementation
Timeline.
[Original punctuation provided.]
2020
square4 Parties worked out differences and signed all five
previously -negotiated Scopes:
square4 Initial Diligent Relative Searches (IDRS)
square4 Ongoing Relative Searches (ORS)
square4 Family Contact
square4 Licensing Assists
square4 Safety Evaluations
2021
square4 Compact negotiations included all previously -
negotiated scopes of work and added funding for
preventative services
2022
square4 Negotiations will occur in April 2022
2:16:53 PM
REPRESENTATIVE ZULKOSKY reviewed slide 7, Advantages.
[Original punctuation provided.]
square4 Provides higher quality services, closer to home,
at a lower cost through leveraging Tribal
resources
square4 Strengthens state services by engaging Tribes,
often the most local government, on an issue of
shared interest
square4 Increased public trust through existing family
relationships with Tribes
square4 Preventative services lower ACE scores
square4 ACEs are potentially traumatic events that
occur in childhood (0-17 years) and can lead to
chronic health problems, mental illness,
substance abuse disorders and increased
incarceration in adulthood.
2:17:54 PM
REPRESENTATIVE ZULKOSKY reviewed slide 8, Sectional Analysis.
Section 1: Amends AS 47.05 to add a new section to
article 1 requiring the State to participate in a
Tribal Child Welfare Compact.
2:18:11 PM
REPRESENTATIVE ZULKOSKY explained the timing for HB 184.
Currently, the Tribal Child Welfare Compact is accomplished by
executive initiative. She said HB 184 seeks to provide a firm
anchor in state law for the ongoing implementation of the
Compact with zero fiscal impact. This bill would give the co-
signers stability and predictability to administer quality
programs to vulnerable youth and families in the most remote
parts of the state without worrying about whether the Compact
will continue.
REPRESENTATIVE ZULKOSKY acknowledged that legislators often hear
statistics that generally lead to good policy. Still, they also
provide distance between the legislature's decisions and their
consequential effects on families. She said that is why this
bill and the Compact are fascinating. The Tribal Child Welfare
Compact is not just a positive step in the state's relationship
with its tribal partners, it is also an innovative and forward-
thinking policy that reaches children and families in a
meaningful way.
2:19:58 PM
SENATOR REINBOLD commented that she had heard numerous
complaints about OCS and was seeking solutions. She wondered
about the discrepancy between the 161 tribes mentioned today and
the 229 tribes mentioned during a hearing on another bill.
REPRESENTATIVE ZULKOSKY answered that there are 229 federally-
recognized tribes in Alaska. This initiative is a state and
tribal compact, which means that the state and tribal co-signers
are signing on in an agreement to provide specifically
negotiated scopes of work. She referred to slide 4, which shows
that 18 tribal co-signers represent 161 of the 229 federally-
recognized tribes in Alaska.
2:21:35 PM
SENATOR REINBOLD wondered how tribes were identified.
REPRESENTATIVE ZULKOSKY deferred the question to Nicole
Borromeo, General Counsel, Alaska Federation of Natives.
CHAIR WILSON reiterated that the question for Ms. Borromeo was
how tribal membership is established.
2:22:51 PM
SENATOR REINBOLD asked whether the Alaska Tribal Child Welfare
Compact would only impact children in Alaska or if it would
affect tribes in other states.
REPRESENTATIVE ZULKOSKY answered that Alaska Tribal Child
Welfare Compact is a negotiated agreement between Alaska's
federally-recognized tribes and the state concerning specific
work being done through the Office of Children's Services (OCS).
She explained that the jurisdiction of the child remains with
the state. The tribes are leveraging their resources and
relationships to offer support to OCS in diligent and ongoing
relative searches, family contacts, licensing assistance, and
safety evaluations.
2:24:20 PM
SENATOR REINBOLD related a scenario involving a woman from
another state whose divorce led to a jurisdictional dispute. She
stated that she was trying to understand the impacts of HB 184.
2:25:12 PM
SENATOR COSTELLO stated that she had questions similar to the
ones Senator Reinbold had asked regarding the number of tribes
and how tribal membership is defined. She wondered about the
number of children helped by the Alaska Tribal Child Welfare
Compact and in which communities they reside.
REPRESENTATIVE ZULKOSKY deferred to invited testifiers to
discuss the type of support that tribes have provided to
families and clarify the scope of the compact. She stated that
the compact seeks to leverage support and provide diligent
relative searches, but the custody of the child remains with the
state.
2:26:45 PM
SENATOR COSTELLO wondered about the number of children and where
they were located. She related her understanding that HB 184
requires the state to participate in a compact, which typically
is government-to-government. She stated that in the past, the
compact was something the executive branch initiated with the
tribes. She asked whether the Alaska Tribal Child Welfare
Compact would violate any balance of power between the
legislative and executive branches. She noted that the executive
branch and federally-recognized tribes have already been doing
this successfully. If this is allowed, she wondered what would
keep the legislature from forcing the executive branch to enter
into compacts in other areas such that that it would dilute the
power of the executive branch.
REPRESENTATIVE ZULKOSKY responded that the intent of HB 184 was
to protect, provide clarity, and allow the state to continue to
explore the state and tribal relations as it relates to the
compact. She stated that nothing in HB 184 would compel the
state to specific negotiations, agreements, or funding levels.
She noted that those negotiated scopes of work and funding
agreements that accompany them were at the discretion of the
state and the tribes. She indicated that she intended to protect
this systematic innovation by codifying it in statute. She
indicated she was open to suggestions to provide clarity and
ensure protection for the excellent work of the compact without
running into constitutional issues.
2:29:53 PM
SENATOR HUGHES asked whether this approach has resulted in
improvements.
REPRESENTATIVE ZULKOSKY deferred to Nicole Borromeo to respond.
2:30:58 PM
SENATOR BEGICH stated that the bill uses the directive language
"shall enter into agreements." He asked why that language was
necessary.
REPRESENTATIVE ZULKOSKY responded that the intent was to codify
the expectation and intent that the tribal compacts would
continue to accomplish the work that needs to be done.
2:31:53 PM
SENATOR BEGICH related his understanding that "shall" means that
if a compact is negotiated between the department and state, the
state must adhere to it. He offered his view that would be good
intent, but he was unsure whether he had fairly described it.
REPRESENTATIVE ZULKOSKY responded that the state and the tribes
would negotiate yearly in any compact. She characterized it as
essentially doing an annual program evaluation to determine what
is successful, what needs additional work, and any funding
agreements to align with that work. She indicated that "shall"
was used because the state and tribes have agreed on the scope
of work and funding. She acknowledged that there might be
concerns. Ultimately, the goal is to codify the innovation being
accomplished between the state and the tribes by protecting that
work in statute.
2:33:32 PM
SENATOR BEGICH stated that she had affirmed the certainty of the
bill.
2:33:40 PM
CHAIR WILSON turned to invited testimony.
2:34:40 PM
At ease
2:35:26 PM
CHAIR WILSON reconvened the meeting.
2:36:00 PM
TRACI MCGARRY, Director, Children & Family Services; Child
Advocacy Center, Kawerak Inc., Nome, Alaska, provided invited
testimony supporting HB 184. She said she speaks on behalf of
the three Alaska Tribal Child Welfare Compact co-leaders and 15
co-signers representing 161 of the 229 Alaska Native Tribes
throughout the state. She said she had been the director for 10
years. She noted that Alaska Native tribes know what is best for
their children and Alaska Native families and communities are
the best places for their children to thrive. Alaska Native
children steeped in the love, values, and cultures of their
tribe have the best chance of being healthy, engaged members of
society.
MS. MCGARRY reminded members that this compact is the first
agreement in the nation between the state and tribal
organizations to transfer certain negotiated child welfare
services and associated funding streams to tribes and tribal
organizations to administer on behalf of the state. She said the
goal of the compact is to improve child welfare by including and
investing in tribes. She noted that codifying the compact into
state law ensures that tribes can invest in infrastructure and
longevity of staff and not worry about future funding. This
allows co-signers to focus on the most important work, the
children and families of Alaska. She stated that tribes and
tribal organizations have worked alongside the Office of
Children's Services (OCS) for many years. This compact would
solidify the commitment of both parties to improve outcomes for
all children, Native and non-Native, in state custody. She
suggested that co-signers can provide efficient, effective child
welfare work in children's home communities. She urged members
to move HB 184 from committee.
2:38:29 PM
SENATOR HUGHES asked for data showing improvements in outcomes
over the last 10 years.
MS. MCGARRY responded that the implementation process is
ongoing. She related that Casey Family Programs, a clinical case
management organization, recently provided training to the state
and tribes on implementation science. She has been working on
ensuring that the scopes are appropriately implemented. She
stated that, parents, foster parents and grandparents don't want
their children in state custody, so being able to care for their
children was important. She explained that the infrastructure
support that the state provides through the Alaska Tribal Child
Welfare Compact would allow the tribes and tribal entities to do
preventative work instead of handling crises. She stated that
Kawerak's staff has been able to conduct relative searches.
Although she did not have specific figures, she indicated that
Kawerak had been able to hire someone via the compact. This has
resulted in moving children into relative placements earlier
than in the past. She noted that Kawerak could not have hired
that person without the funding that the Alaska Tribal Child
Welfare Compact provided.
2:40:10 PM
SENATOR HUGHES said it is a challenging world right now, and
these children need help. She expressed an interest in learning
more about the successes.
2:40:26 PM
SENATOR BEGICH reinforced Ms. McGarry's comments regarding
certainty because it allows tribes and tribal entities to
recruit and retain child welfare staff with the highest
turnover. He surmised that it goes to Senator Hughes' concern
about outcomes because experienced caseworkers are often the
most effective ones. He emphasized that it makes sense to
support HB 184 because of the level of certainty it would
provide.
2:41:32 PM
NICOLE BORROMEO, Executive Vice President; General Counsel,
Alaska Federation of Natives (AFN), Anchorage, Alaska, stated
that she had held this position since 2014. She said she has
served as the facilitator for the Alaska Tribal Child Welfare
Compact.
MS. BORROMEO, in response to Senator Reinbold's question about
how tribes determine membership, explained that membership is
based on a case-by-case determination by the 229 federally-
recognized tribes, but there are 574 federally-recognized tribes
throughout the nation. She said each tribe is an independent
sovereign with its policies and procedures for determining
tribal membership. In the 1970s, the US Supreme Court in Morton
v. Mancari [417 U.S. 535 (1974] held that how a tribe defines
its membership was up to each tribe. The federal government will
not second-guess tribal involvement. Most tribes have an
eligibility process, such that children are eligible in most
instances if their parents are enrolled members of the tribe or
if they are eligible for membership in the tribe.
2:44:20 PM
SENATOR REINBOLD asked for an example of tribal eligibility for
one of the tribes.
2:44:44 PM
MS. BORROMEO responded that several criteria applied. For
example, a number of tribes have blood quantum criteria;
however, that was more popular in the early 70s and 80s, and
many tribes are moving away from blood quantum. Some tribes had
geographic requirements, such as living on a reservation or in a
village. She noted that except for Metlakatla, an Indian
Reserve, Alaska does not have reservations. She said those were
traditional criteria; whether the tribes adhere to the
requirements is up to the individual tribes.
2:45:50 PM
SENATOR COSTELLO related her understanding that HB 184 would
require the executive branch to have a compact. She asked
whether this was something new and if it meant the legislative
branch had a new avenue within the executive branch. For
instance, she asked if the legislature could create compacts to
require the executive branch to enter into agreements or
compacts. She asked whether the Alaska Tribal Child Welfare
Compact would continue without this bill under a subsequent
administration.
2:46:47 PM
MS. BORROMEO related her understanding that the questions all
relate to whether HB 184 would upset the balance of power
between the executive and legislative branches of government.
She responded that the short answer was no. She suggested that
if members think of the Alaska Tribal Child Welfare Compact
(Compact) as a regulation, the legislature would be codifying
the regulation. It would cement the Alaska Tribal Child Welfare
Compact more permanently in state law. It would make it easier
for future administrations to move forward with the compact and
for tribal co-signers to plan on its existence each year. She
explained that compacts could be authorized by statute or by
executive branch action. She noted that it frequently occurs in
the federal government, such as the Indian Self-Determination
Act and the compacts between Alaska tribal organizations and
tribes for health care services and the delivery of self-
governance-related services. She offered her belief that HB 184
makes it easier for the state and tribes to administer child
welfare services cost-effectively and provide higher quality
services at a lower cost to the state.
2:48:31 PM
MS. BORROMEO, in response to the question on service population,
said it would depend on how the tribal co-signer defined its
service population and service delivery area. For instance, it
would be possible for a co-signer to service a child outside the
State of Alaska if the child was enrolled in the tribe or
eligible for membership in the tribe. She stated that it would
fall under the service-delivery population, not necessarily the
service-delivery area, but generally tied to the village or
region where the tribe or tribal organization operates.
MS. BORROMEO indicated that Representative Zulkosky covered much
of her planned testimony. She reiterated that compacts of this
nature are entirely legal under federal and state law. The
Alaska State Legislature was not being asked to do anything that
would take away from the State of Alaska's jurisdiction over
tribal welfare matters. HB 184 was meant to improve the
administration of children in need of care, Alaska Native or
non-Native children, depending on whether the tribe would like
to provide services to those children. However, only Alaska
Native children were currently being served by the Alaska Tribal
Child Welfare Compact.
2:50:41 PM
VIVIAN KORTHUIS, Chief Executive Officer, Association of Village
Council Presidents (AVCP), Bethel, Alaska, provided invited
testimony in support of HB 184. She stated that AVCP was the
largest tribal consortium in the nation, with 56 federally-
recognized tribes as members, serving tribes on the Yukon River,
Kuskokwim River, and the Bering Sea coast on the Yukon-Kuskokwim
Delta (YKD). She said approximately 30,000 residents live in the
region.
MS. KORTHUIS stated that the Alaska Tribal Child Welfare Compact
is a government-to-government agreement between the State of
Alaska and tribes. She explained that tribes agree to perform
negotiated child welfare services for tribal children on behalf
of the state. Tribes can perform these services efficiently,
effectively, and culturally appropriately. AVCP's executive
board decided to be one of the founding members of the compact
in 2017 because tribes place a high value on their children. She
provided an example of what this means to the YKD region. She
said approximately 500 tribal children from the AVCP region are
in the Office of Children's Service (OCS) custody. She noted
that a medium-sized village in the region would be 500 people.
She said half of the children placed live in homes or facilities
outside the YKD. That figure represents a smaller village in the
region.
2:53:22 PM
MS. KORTHUIS stated that removing a child from their home and
parents is a traumatic experience for any child, even if the
removal was to keep them safe. She asked members to imagine a
child leaving their home, their house, their parents, and
everything familiar to move to Anchorage or another part of
Alaska, which multiplies the trauma. She emphasized that each of
the 500 children are people.
MS. KORTHUIS related that OCS removed an AVCP tribal member's
child from their parent's home in Anchorage. In that case, OCS
contacted AVCP to identify a relative. AVCP found a relative and
completed a safety walk-through of the home. She reported that
the child was able to move to the relative's home in the
village. She highlighted that this was possible because the
Alaska Tribal Child Welfare Compact provided the process for OCS
to make the referral. She said AVCP received the funding to
identify a home and obtain approval. She indicated this was one
way the tribal organization was helping its children through the
compact and why it is so important.
MS. KORTHUIS emphasized that YKD wants their children to remain
in the community whenever possible.
2:55:11 PM
MS. KORTHUIS highlighted another benefit of working with tribes
under the Alaska Tribal Child Welfare Compact: the ability to
leverage resources. She stated that it allows AVCP to leverage
other programs, such as providing potential foster care families
with the equipment they need to become licensed, making
necessary repairs to foster homes, and providing childcare
resources. She emphasized that the children are important,
needed, and represent one of the most valuable resources for all
of the tribes in the region. She said AVCP fully supports the
Alaska Tribal Child Welfare Compact and reaffirms the state's
goal for better outcomes for all of Alaska's children. She
further stated that AVCP supports HB 184 and all of its intent.
2:56:19 PM
CHAIR WILSON opened public testimony on HB 184.
2:56:31 PM
TREVOR STORRS, President; Chief Executive Officer, Alaska
Children's Trust, Anchorage, Alaska, stated that he was speaking
to the committee from the land of the Dena'ina people. As the
statewide lead organization working to prevent child abuse and
neglect, the Alaska Children's Trust strongly supports the
Alaska Tribal Child Welfare Compact.
MR. STORRS stated that Alaska has one of the country's highest
child abuse and neglect rates. Each year the Office of
Children's Services (OCS) receives approximately 20,000 calls,
of which 45 percent result in investigations. As the Department
of Health and Social Services shared this year, OCS continually
struggles with high turnover rates, most recently reported at 60
percent. OCS cannot engage in prevention work with every case it
receives. The Alaska Tribal Child Welfare Compact represents an
innovative approach to strengthening OCS's capacity. Still, it
would allow for culturally appropriate services and support for
Alaska's families in their communities.
2:57:40 PM
MR. STORRS stated that Alaska Native children make up 15 percent
of the state's general population but represent approximately 65
percent of the kids in state custody. The disproportionate
number of Alaska Native children in the OCS system must be
addressed, but it will take long-term sustainable, systemic
change. He emphasized that was exactly what the Alaska Tribal
Child Welfare Compact seeks to accomplish. He reported that over
the last four years, the compact had allowed tribes and tribal
organizations to assist in finding relatives to care for
children, visit homes in advance to ensure safe placement, help
at-risk families before they need OCS intervention, and work
alongside OCS to ensure families have the additional support
they need.
MR. STORRS indicated that this historic, unique compact was
working and needed to be made permanent to address the child
welfare needs. He urged members to support HB 184 to help
prevent child abuse and neglect.
2:58:44 PM
CHAIR WILSON closed public testimony on HB 184.
2:59:00 PM
SENATOR HUGHES remarked that Ms. Korthuis's testimony about
children being removed from the world they know was compelling.
She expressed interest in knowing that the Alaska Tribal Child
Welfare Compact was working well.
2:59:43 PM
CHAIR WILSON suggested that OCS could provide the committee with
data on the effectiveness of the Alaska Tribal Child Welfare
Compact.
REPRESENTATIVE ZULKOSKY thanked the committee. She said this
bill would provide an opportunity to help protect the work being
done collaboratively by the state and tribes.
2:59:57 PM
CHAIR WILSON held HB 184 in committee.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| HB 184 Sectional Analysis version A.pdf |
HHSS 4/22/2021 3:00:00 PM HTRB 5/4/2021 8:00:00 AM SHSS 3/31/2022 1:30:00 PM |
HB 184 |
| HB 184 Sponsor Statement version A.pdf |
HHSS 4/22/2021 3:00:00 PM HTRB 5/4/2021 8:00:00 AM SHSS 3/31/2022 1:30:00 PM |
HB 184 |
| HB 184 LOS_Maniilaq.pdf |
SHSS 3/31/2022 1:30:00 PM |
HB 184 |
| HB 184 LOS_Alaska Childrens Trust.pdf |
HHSS 4/27/2021 3:00:00 PM HTRB 5/4/2021 8:00:00 AM SHSS 3/31/2022 1:30:00 PM |
HB 184 |
| HB 184 LOS_Alaska Regional Coalition.pdf |
HHSS 4/27/2021 3:00:00 PM SHSS 3/31/2022 1:30:00 PM |
HB 184 |
| SB 175 Work Draft v.G.pdf |
SHSS 3/31/2022 1:30:00 PM |
SB 175 |
| SB 175 Testimony 3.21.22.pdf |
SHSS 3/31/2022 1:30:00 PM |
SB 175 |
| SB 175 Letters 3.30.22.pdf |
SHSS 3/31/2022 1:30:00 PM |
SB 175 |
| SB 175 Exp of Changes V.I to V.G.pdf |
SHSS 3/31/2022 1:30:00 PM |
SB 175 |
| HB 184 Letter 3.16.22.pdf |
SHSS 3/31/2022 1:30:00 PM |
HB 184 |
| SB 175 A 1.pdf |
SHSS 3/31/2022 1:30:00 PM |
SB 175 |
| HB 184 Powerpoint 3-31-2022.pdf |
SHSS 3/31/2022 1:30:00 PM |
HB 184 |
| SB 175 A 2.pdf |
SHSS 3/31/2022 1:30:00 PM |
SB 175 |
| HB 184 Powerpoint #2 3.31.22.pdf |
SHSS 3/31/2022 1:30:00 PM |
HB 184 |
| SB 175 Supporting Doc Pay Parity 4.4.22.pdf |
SHSS 3/31/2022 1:30:00 PM |
SB 175 |
| SB 175 Ammendments Considered.pdf |
SHSS 3/31/2022 1:30:00 PM |
SB 175 |
| SB 175 FN BH UPDATED 2.18.22.pdf |
SHSS 3/31/2022 1:30:00 PM |
SB 175 |
| SHSS SB175 Follow-Up Information from CBPL (4.4.22).pdf |
SHSS 3/31/2022 1:30:00 PM |
SB 175 |